- From: Matthias Schunter <mts@zurich.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 14:50:22 +0200
- To: public-tracking@w3.org
Hi Team, enclosed is the agenda for tomorrow's call. After a summary of the ongoing discussions on 1st parties and their behavior under DNT, we will focus on the DNT protocol (Roy Fielding being the corresponding editor) with a particular focus on the response message. Feel free to post response proposals on the mailing list and/or discuss existing proposals. Regards, matthias ================ Infrastructure ================= Zakim teleconference bridge: VoIP: sip:zakim@voip.w3.org Phone +1617761.6200 passcode TRACK (87225) IRC Chat: IRC: irc.w3.org, port 6665, #dnt ================ Agenda for 2011-10-12 WG Call ================= Details: See calendar at https://www.google.com/calendar/embed?src=is1g67kems9ijeroa7ud7dhhg4%40group.calendar.google.com&ctz=America/Los_Angeles ------------ Administrative ------------ 1. Selection of scribe 2. Any comments on minutes from the last call: http://www.w3.org/2011/10/04-dnt-minutes.html 3. Announcement: Division of Work between the Chairs: ------------ Old business ------------ 4. Review of action items: http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/ 5. Summary of discussions on 1st and 3rd parties addition to strawman-proposals --------------------------- New business: Tracking Preferences Expression Chair: Matthias Schunter Editor: Roy Fielding --------------------------- --------------------------- 6. Response Headers A) ISSUES ISSUE-81 Do we need a response at all from server? ISSUE-51 Should 1st party have any response to DNT signal ISSUE-79 Should a server respond if a user sent DNT:0? ISSUE-76 Should a server echo the DNT header to confirm receipt? ISSUE-48 Response from the server could both acknowledge receipt of a value and (separately) whether the server will honor it ISSUE-87 Should there be an option for the server to respond with "I don't know what my policy is" ISSUE-47 Should the response from the server point to a URI of a policy (or an existing protocol) rather than a single bit in the protocol? ISSUE-80 Instead of responding with a Link: header URI, does it make sense to use a well-known location for this policy? B) Presentation of Proposals on the table C) Discussion D) Steps towards a strawman - Homework/Actions - Tasks for the editor --------------------------- 9. Announce next meeting & Adjourn
Received on Tuesday, 11 October 2011 12:50:54 UTC