On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com> wrote: > > Le 16 oct. 2011 à 01:35, Jonathan Mayer a écrit : > > Second, I'm very hesitant to provide a broad "affiliate" carveout. In > other privacy debates, affiliate relationships have proven to be sizable > loopholes. > > plus they are technically impossible to decipher. > http://www.w3.org/wiki/FirstThirdPartyDetection > There have been a few discussions (published and in the f2f) on technical approaches to resolve issue. e.g.- a commonly published file, some response header metadata, and even a few approaches using DNS. I agree, there are loopholes with all of those technical approaches. But they are technical solutions. I'd suggest, the best approach is to find one (or more) technique where it is reasonably easy to be a good actor to promote adoption -- and a reasonably easy bit-trail for groups to detect groups exploiting a loophole. --cw Clay Webster Associate Vice President, Platform Infrastructure T 908-541-3724 C 908-507-6663 F 908-575-7474 1200 Route 22 East, Bridgewater NJ 08807
Received on Monday, 24 October 2011 18:07:37 UTC