W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > October 2011

Re: Summary of Options for 1P Learning of 3P DNT Status

From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 09:13:23 -0700
Message-Id: <3EF2E321-8CCA-4413-AB6E-C8B861851B1A@gbiv.com>
To: "public-tracking@w3.org Group WG" <public-tracking@w3.org>
er, sorry, I responded to a completely different topic ... not enough sleep
(or the halloween haunt soundtrack drove me nuts last night).


On Oct 30, 2011, at 11:57 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:

> On Oct 30, 2011, at 11:38 PM, Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) wrote:
>> In short, none of the above solutions seems workable from my viewpoint. 
> I agree.  I also don't think that any of them are necessary.  If a website
> wishes to distinguish between resources that act as a third party and
> resources that act as a first party, then it can use different URIs for
> them (just as they normally do).
> I don't think we need to worry about accidental or deliberate transclusion
> by an unrelated website, which would turn the first party resource into
> a theoretical third-party resource.  If any cross-site tracking occurs in
> that situation, it will be the fault of the unrelated website.
> ....Roy
Received on Monday, 31 October 2011 16:16:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:38:26 UTC