- From: Carmen Balber <carmen@consumerwatchdog.org>
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 11:07:28 -0400
- To: Tracking Protection Working Group WG <public-tracking@w3.org>
Thanks for adding on my behalf Aleecia. Creating this as a question separate from issue 59 re notification of 1st parties makes sense. Carmen -- Carmen Balber Washington Director Consumer Watchdog 413 E. Capitol St. SE, 1st Floor Washington, D.C 20003 p:(202) 629-3043 http://www.consumerwatchdog.org On 10/19/11 3:05 PM, "Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker" <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote: > > tracking-ISSUE-93: Should 1st parties be able to degrade a user experience or > charge money for content based on DNT? [Tracking Definitions and Compliance] > > http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/93 > > Raised by: Aleecia McDonald > On product: Tracking Definitions and Compliance > > [Note: raised by Carmen, who is working through W3C paperwork] > > We would be leery of first parties being able to penalize consumers (for > example, with a pay wall, blocking content entirely, or perhaps by other > means) because consumers implemented Do Not Track. > >
Received on Thursday, 20 October 2011 20:29:53 UTC