W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > October 2011

Re: tracking-ISSUE-93: Should 1st parties be able to degrade a user experience or charge money for content based on DNT? [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]

From: Carmen Balber <carmen@consumerwatchdog.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 11:07:28 -0400
To: Tracking Protection Working Group WG <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAC5B170.3CF97%carmen@consumerwatchdog.org>
Thanks for adding on my behalf Aleecia. Creating this as a question separate
from issue 59 re notification of 1st parties makes sense.

Carmen
-- 
Carmen Balber
Washington Director
Consumer Watchdog
413 E. Capitol St. SE, 1st Floor
Washington, D.C  20003
p:(202) 629-3043
http://www.consumerwatchdog.org


On 10/19/11 3:05 PM, "Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker"
<sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:

> 
> tracking-ISSUE-93: Should 1st parties be able to degrade a user experience or
> charge money for content based on DNT? [Tracking Definitions and Compliance]
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/93
> 
> Raised by: Aleecia McDonald
> On product: Tracking Definitions and Compliance
> 
> [Note: raised by Carmen, who is working through W3C paperwork]
> 
> We would be leery of first parties being able to penalize consumers (for
> example, with a pay wall, blocking content entirely, or perhaps by other
> means) because consumers implemented Do Not Track.
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 20 October 2011 20:29:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:44:41 UTC