Re: TPE Document, S2.3 P1

Agreed. If SPDY becomes a community standard, DNT HTTP/SPDY optimization
can be considered. Until then, let's work with community standards.

On 10/31/2011 12:11 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
> On Oct 31, 2011, at 11:40 AM, Ashkan Soltani wrote:
> 
>> +1
>>
>> Should we also discuss upcoming protocols like SPDY?  http://www.chromium.org/spdy
> 
> SPDY just tunnels HTTP header fields with compression, so there is no concern
> about support.  They might want to implement something more efficient, just as
> I would in waka, but that is not our concern.   And, no, I won't reference
> SPDY until it is submitted to a legitimate standards forum.
> 
> ....Roy