W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > October 2011

Proposed definition of 1st parties

From: Matthias Schunter <mts@zurich.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:25:02 +0200
Message-ID: <4EA8426E.9060306@zurich.ibm.com>
To: "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Hi Folks,


enclosed is the proposal on a definition of 1st parties as indicated
on the call.

An assumption is that FIRST PARTIES and AFFILIATES will later need to
satisfy relaxed requirements compared to THIRD PARTIES.

The goals of the def are:
 - Not to fix the mechanisms.
 - To put the burden of proof/implementation/mechanism/design
   on the parties that want to fall under the exemptions.


Regards,
matthias


A FIRST PARTY MUST be able to reliably determine that
 - The user has explicitly visited a web-site of this party
 - That the user has consciously and willingly interacted with it

An AFFILIATE MUST be able to reliably determine
 [criteria defined elsewhere: suggestions were
   - co-branding
   - co-ownership
   - same origin...]

All other parties SHOULD be considered THIRD PARTY.


-- 
Dr. Matthias Schunter, MBA
IBM Research - Zurich, Switzerland
Ph. +41 (44) 724-8329,  schunter(at)acm.org
PGP 989A A3ED 21A1 9EF2 B005 8374 BE0E E10D
VCard: http://www.schunter.org/schunter.vcf
Received on Wednesday, 26 October 2011 17:25:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:44:41 UTC