- From: Matthias Schunter <mts@zurich.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 17:28:54 +0200
- To: "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Hi Team, based on Roy's draft, I would like to perform some cleanup on our issues list. Let's discuss in our call whether these changes are OK with you. PROCEDURE: During the call, I'd like to walk through the document and discuss what to do with the containued issues. The enclosed list contains my proposals on what to do with some of these issues. Regards, matthias -----8<------------------------------------------- ============ POSTPONE = We do not address these issues in this version of TPE ============ ISSUE-13: What are the requirements for DNT on apps/native software in addition to browsers? ============ UNDER_REVIEW = there is proposed text in the current draft ============ ISSUE-82: Should the DNT header be extensible with additional parameters? - YES: String after 0/1 value in request header ISSUE-78: What is the difference between absence of DNT header and DNT = 0? - DNT=0 means that a user EXPRESSED that tracking is OK. - Absence means that no preference is known to the user agent ""ISSUE-70: Does a past HTTP request with DNT set affect future HTTP requests? "" No ""ISSUE-50: Are DNT headers sent to first parties? "" YES ============ Out of scope = We choose not to address these issues in our spec ============ ISSUE-64: How does preference management work with DNT ISSUE-68: Should there be functionality for syncing preferences about tracking across different browsers? ISSUE-40: Enable Do Not Track just for a session, rather than being stored ISSUE-42: Feedback to the user from the browser when Do Not Track is turned on -- Dr. Matthias Schunter, MBA IBM Research - Zurich, Switzerland Ph. +41 (44) 724-8329, schunter(at)acm.org PGP 989A A3ED 21A1 9EF2 B005 8374 BE0E E10D VCard: http://www.schunter.org/schunter.vcf
Received on Wednesday, 26 October 2011 15:29:37 UTC