W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > October 2011

Re: Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80]

From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 17:18:43 -0700
Message-id: <351C0CA4-E119-49BF-A3CF-CCA88E0FA360@apple.com>
To: Tracking Protection Working Group WG <public-tracking@w3.org>
I think it may be easier to write rules for caches, proxies etc.

For a start, if a request is satisfied by a cache, the origin server isn't even aware of a transaction, and can hardly track me at all.

Then, we can state that the DNT header response is not cacheable.

David Singer
Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Friday, 28 October 2011 00:20:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:44:41 UTC