Re: Proposed language for first-party websites

• From: Aleecia M. McDonald <aleecia@aleecia.com>
• Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 14:48:06 -0700
• To: public-tracking@w3.org
• Message-Id: <CD6AB6A6-F7E8-4BA9-9B31-17D60C66DF0C@aleecia.com>

Thanks to Jonathan for getting through his open actions and kicking off discussion.

Quiet as mice... What do you all say to his proposed language for third- and first-party websites? Should I take silence as unanimous agreement? 

	Aleecia

On Oct 3, 2011, at 7:41 PM, Jonathan Mayer wrote:

> (ACTION-11, ISSUE-17, and ISSUE-51)
> 
> First-Party Requirements:
> This standard imposes no requirements on first-party websites.  A first-party website MAY take steps to protect user privacy in responding to a Do Not Track request.
> 

Received on Tuesday, 4 October 2011 21:48:39 UTC