- From: Ninja Marnau <nmarnau@datenschutzzentrum.de>
- Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:14:28 +0200
- To: public-tracking@w3.org
Hi, in case you find the link to the minutes of last week's call not working like me, it has to be: http://www.w3.org/2011/10/05-dnt-minutes.html Best regards, Ninja Am 11.10.2011 14:50, schrieb Matthias Schunter: > Hi Team, > > enclosed is the agenda for tomorrow's call. > > After a summary of the ongoing discussions on 1st parties and their > behavior under DNT, we will focus on the DNT protocol (Roy Fielding > being the corresponding editor) with a particular focus on the > response message. > > Feel free to post response proposals on the mailing list and/or > discuss existing proposals. > > > Regards, > matthias > > ================ Infrastructure ================= > > Zakim teleconference bridge: > VoIP: sip:zakim@voip.w3.org > Phone +1617761.6200 passcode TRACK (87225) > IRC Chat: > IRC: irc.w3.org, port 6665, #dnt > > ================ Agenda for 2011-10-12 WG Call ================= > > Details: See calendar at > https://www.google.com/calendar/embed?src=is1g67kems9ijeroa7ud7dhhg4%40group.calendar.google.com&ctz=America/Los_Angeles > > ------------ > Administrative > ------------ > > 1. Selection of scribe > > 2. Any comments on minutes from the last call: > http://www.w3.org/2011/10/04-dnt-minutes.html > > 3. Announcement: Division of Work between the Chairs: > > > ------------ > Old business > ------------ > > 4. Review of action items: > http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/ > > 5. Summary of discussions on 1st and 3rd parties addition to > strawman-proposals > > > --------------------------- > New business: Tracking Preferences Expression > > Chair: Matthias Schunter > Editor: Roy Fielding > --------------------------- > > --------------------------- > 6. Response Headers > > > A) ISSUES > ISSUE-81 Do we need a response at all from server? > ISSUE-51 Should 1st party have any response to DNT signal > ISSUE-79 Should a server respond if a user sent DNT:0? > ISSUE-76 Should a server echo the DNT header to confirm receipt? > ISSUE-48 Response from the server could both acknowledge receipt of a > value and (separately) whether the server will honor it > ISSUE-87 Should there be an option for the server to respond with "I > don't know what my policy is" > ISSUE-47 Should the response from the server point to a URI of a > policy (or an existing protocol) rather than a single bit in the protocol? > ISSUE-80 Instead of responding with a Link: header URI, does it make > sense to use a well-known location for this policy? > > B) Presentation of Proposals on the table > > > C) Discussion > > D) Steps towards a strawman > - Homework/Actions > - Tasks for the editor > > > --------------------------- > 9. Announce next meeting& Adjourn > > -- Ninja Marnau mail: NMarnau@datenschutzzentrum.de - http://www.datenschutzzentrum.de Telefon: +49 431/988-1285, Fax +49 431/988-1223 Unabhaengiges Landeszentrum fuer Datenschutz Schleswig-Holstein Independent Centre for Privacy Protection Schleswig-Holstein
Received on Tuesday, 11 October 2011 13:10:34 UTC