W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > October 2011

Re: [ISSUE-81, ACTION-13] Response Header Format

From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 13:05:09 +0200
To: public-tracking@w3.org
Cc: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Matthias Schunter <mts@zurich.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <3036033.uvG3EtbcqE@longtarin>
On Thursday 27 October 2011 16:57:16 David Singer wrote:
> The user or user-agent deserves to know which clause of the privacy policy
> they currently fall into, and a static document can't tell them that.

David, it must. Otherwise you're back in P3P. And the contextual complexity 
(which clause of the privacy policy) will kill deployment.

If we scope the meaning of the DNT header meaning for this request you'll get 
context. If we scope the meaning of DNT saying for this site you don't get 
context. The meaning of the DNT header is not defined by your privacy policy, 
but by the Specification. Otherwise, the DNT header would be nearly 
meaningless. 

Best, 

Rigo
Received on Friday, 28 October 2011 11:05:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:44:41 UTC