W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > October 2011

Re: Well-known URI vs response headers? [ISSUE-81, ISSUE-47, ISSUE-80]

From: Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 15:42:58 -0400
Message-Id: <26AFDC23-9DED-43F8-82C9-8DFF972B1876@opera.com>
Cc: public-tracking@w3.org
To: Ronan Heffernan <ronansan@gmail.com>

Le 28 oct. 2011 à 09:41, Ronan Heffernan a écrit :
> By putting content under "ak.mysite.com", the wkl for your DNT response would be something like "mysite.com/dnt/" or "ak.mysite.com/dnt/" (with the possibility to 301 or 302 redirect to another location?)  There is no need for a million-line wkl response at the root of Akamai.

In fact it is a bit more complex than that.
It is happening you might use a CDN for a little while 
depending on special events to allow the servers to cope 
with the charge. I'm not saying it is good practice but 
that it is actually happening. :) seen it for a sport Web 
sites with very high traffic at very specific moments of 
the seasons. 

Karl Dubost - http://dev.opera.com/
Developer Relations & Tools, Opera Software
Received on Friday, 28 October 2011 19:43:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:44:41 UTC