- From: Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 14:34:58 -0400
- To: Justin Brookman <justin@cdt.org>
- Cc: public-tracking@w3.org
Le 25 oct. 2011 à 23:16, Justin Brookman a écrit : > Fair enough, but the legal definition of consent is actually incredibly vague in many jurisdictions, and we may wish to specify a higher standard for users in those places where the requirements are weak or unclear. In fact I do not think we can. For a simple reason, W3C produces documents which can be used for enabling mechanism, protocols, etc. Web accessibility documents are a good example. They explain how the technology can be used to create accessible documents (i.e. documents used by people with disabilities). We can in that group provide documents explaining how to develop Web sites, clients which will give choices to users to browse with more opacity (or masked if you wish). We can't create document that mandate legal implications. Users organizations, privacy advocates, etc might use our documents to push the legal issues in their countries demonstrating how it is possible to do it. -- Karl Dubost - http://dev.opera.com/ Developer Relations & Tools, Opera Software
Received on Friday, 28 October 2011 18:36:04 UTC