publication infrastructure / respec
IRI guidance
RDF-ISSUE-41 (skolem): Skolemization advice in the RDF dcocument
RDF-ISSUE-40 (skolem): Skolemization advice in the RDF dcocument
Contact with University of Southampton re: possible F2F
[ALL] agenda 27 April telecon
[ALL] minutes last week?
typed literal equality
Graphs, some quick comments
Editors of various Documents
ACTION-27 (ensuring that RESOLUTION of issue-12 gets into RDF Semantics)
- Re: ACTION-27 (ensuring that RESOLUTION of issue-12 gets into RDF Semantics)
[ALL] FTF1 Minutes Update
matching basic graph patterns
[JSON] schema-based mapping of json into RDF
regrets & skolem predicates
- Re: regrets & skolem predicates
- Re: regrets & skolem predicates
- Re: regrets & skolem predicates
- Re: regrets & skolem predicates
[ALL] Document Editors
Turtle and SPARQL 1.1 last call
- Re: Turtle and SPARQL 1.1 last call
- Re: Turtle and SPARQL 1.1 last call
- Re: Turtle and SPARQL 1.1 last call
On the IDN issues (on ISSUE-8)
ACTION-28 Make sure issue-12 resolution gets to SPARQL
18. consequences.
[ALL] Agenda 20 April Telecon
- Re: [ALL] Agenda 20 April Telecon
- skolem
Proposition to host 3rd F2F meeting at INRIA Sophia Antipolis, France 23rd-24th of April 2012
RDF-ISSUE-39: rdf: and rdfs: namespace should resolve to something that meets best practices
RDF-ISSUE-38 (AZ): What new vocabulary should be added to RDF to talk about graphs? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-38 (AZ): What new vocabulary should be added to RDF to talk about graphs? [RDF Graphs]
[ALL] blog post about F2F
Skolemization and RDF Semantics
- Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics
- Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics
- Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics
- Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics
- Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics
- Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics
- Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics
- Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics
- Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics
- Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics
- Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics
- Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics
- Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics
- Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics
- Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics
- Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics
- Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics
- Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics
- Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics
- Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics
- Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics
- Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics
- Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics
- Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics
- Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics
- Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics
- Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics
- Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics
- Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics
- Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics
- Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics
- Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics
- Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics
- Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics
- Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics
aside: "contexts" in RDF
RDF-ISSUE-37 (fragids-in-embedded-rdf): Handling of fragment identifiers in RDF embedded in other document formats
F2F meeting minutes
[ALL] Poll dates/location 2nd FTF
ISSUE-36: Should we change the title of rdf-schema to use the word "Schema" ?
first cut at proposing closure for the RDFCore legacy issue list
- Re: first cut at proposing closure for the RDFCore legacy issue list
- Re: first cut at proposing closure for the RDFCore legacy issue list
- Re: first cut at proposing closure for the RDFCore legacy issue list
REST, g-box, g-text, g-snap
ISSUE-35: Should there be an rdf:Graph construct, or something like that?
Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle
- Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle
- Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle
- Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle
- Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (ISSUE-12)
- Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (ISSUE-12)
- Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (ISSUE-12)
- Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (ISSUE-12)
- Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (ISSUE-12)
- Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (ISSUE-12)
- Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (ISSUE-12)
- rdf:PlainLiteral (ISSUE-12)
- Re: rdf:PlainLiteral (ISSUE-12)
- remembering datatypes - was Re: rdf:PlainLiteral (ISSUE-12)
- Re: remembering datatypes - was Re: rdf:PlainLiteral (ISSUE-12)
- Re: remembering datatypes - was Re: rdf:PlainLiteral (ISSUE-12)
- Re: remembering datatypes - was Re: rdf:PlainLiteral (ISSUE-12)
- Re: remembering datatypes - was Re: rdf:PlainLiteral (ISSUE-12)
- Re: remembering datatypes - was Re: rdf:PlainLiteral (ISSUE-12)
- Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (ISSUE-12)
- Re: remembering datatypes - was Re: rdf:PlainLiteral (ISSUE-12)
- Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (ISSUE-12)
- Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (ISSUE-12)
- Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (ISSUE-12)
- Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle
- Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (ISSUE-12)
- Re: Comments on this afternoon session on Turtle (ISSUE-12)
turning JSON into RDF
presentation f2f about JSON
ISSUE-34: Do we need to add features to turtle, beyond what's in the Submission (such as inverse paths and =)?
ISSUE-33: Do we provide a way to refer to sub-graphs and/or individual triples?
ISSUE-32: Can we identify both g-boxes and g-snaps?
ISSUE-31: Do we produce a standard (REC) syntax for conveying multiple graphs?
ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
- Problems with the RDF Semantics document (was: Re: ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?)
- Re: Problems with the RDF Semantics document
- Re: Problems with the RDF Semantics document
- Re: Problems with the RDF Semantics document
- Re: Problems with the RDF Semantics document
- Re: Problems with the RDF Semantics document
- Re: Problems with the RDF Semantics document
- Re: Problems with the RDF Semantics document
ISSUE-29: Do we support SPARQL's notion of "default graph"?
ISSUE-28: Do we need syntactic nesting of graphs (g-texts) as in N3?
Fwd: some feedback about the graph concept terminology
Regrets to the F2F
Fwd: A use case for graph literals: Schemapedia (ISSUE-5)
Practicalities for the f2f
Re: OWL2 serialized as JSON?
Re: [JSON] A starting point... [fixed]
Fwd: A use case for graph literals: Schemapedia (ISSUE-5)
- Re: Fwd: A use case for graph literals: Schemapedia (ISSUE-5)
Deprecation of X
A use case for graph literals: Schemapedia (ISSUE-5)
- Re: A use case for graph literals: Schemapedia (ISSUE-5)
- Re: A use case for graph literals: Schemapedia (ISSUE-5)
Re: [JSON] Tiny Proposal -- rdf:Lists, property types
[JSON] user segments, version 2
RDF-ISSUE-27 (Deprecate rdf:value): Should we deprecate rdf:value? [Cleanup tasks]
RDF-ISSUE-26 (Deprecate rdf:ID on nodes): Should we deprecate rdf:ID on RDF/XML node elements? (use rdf:about instead) [Cleanup tasks]
RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks]
- Danbri's writeup regarding rdf:value (ISSUE-27)
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification)
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification)
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification)
- [GRAPHS] Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification)
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification)
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification)
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification)
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification)
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification)
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification)
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification)
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification)
- first draft on ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification)
- Re: first draft on ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification)
- Re: first draft on ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification)
- Re: first draft on ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification)
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks]
RDF-ISSUE-24 (Deprecate Containers): Should we deprecate RDF containers (Alt, Bag, Seq)? [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-24 (Deprecate Containers): Should we deprecate RDF containers (Alt, Bag, Seq)? [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-24 (Deprecate Containers): Should we deprecate RDF containers (Alt, Bag, Seq)? [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-24 (Deprecate Containers): Should we deprecate RDF containers (Alt, Bag, Seq)? [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-24 (Deprecate Containers): Should we deprecate RDF containers (Alt, Bag, Seq)? [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-24 (Deprecate Containers): Should we deprecate RDF containers (Alt, Bag, Seq)? [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-24 (Deprecate Containers): Should we deprecate RDF containers (Alt, Bag, Seq)? [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-24 (Deprecate Containers): Should we deprecate RDF containers (Alt, Bag, Seq)? [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-24 (Deprecate Containers): Should we deprecate RDF containers (Alt, Bag, Seq)? [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-24 (Deprecate Containers): Should we deprecate RDF containers (Alt, Bag, Seq)? [Cleanup tasks]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-24 (Deprecate Containers): Should we deprecate RDF containers (Alt, Bag, Seq)? [Cleanup tasks]
Forgot a quote in my last email :-)
canonical definition of RDF?
[Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics
- Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics
- Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics
- Re: [Graphs] Proposal for Named Graph Semantics
[Graphs] g-snap vs. g-box and graph equality
Re: Fwd: [Fwd: [Re: [RDF version of the W3C database.]]]
"RDF Core Work Items" from the Workshop
[Graph] Deprecation of reification
RDF-ISSUE-23 (multigraph-media-types): Does going from single-graph to multi-graph require new format and new media types? [RDF Graphs]
Belated regrets...
Triplestores and their supported RDF import formats, and RDF output via CONSTRUCT
regrets from Nathan for today
[JSON] A starting point...
[JSON] Modularization and JSON-LD
RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April)
- Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April)
- Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April)
- Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April)
- owl:sameAs (Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April))
- Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April)
- Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April)
- Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April)
Re: [JSON] Tiny Proposal
[ALL} Agenda 6 April telecon
Definition of RDF Dataset Merge added to SPARQL query draft
RDF-ISSUE-22 (EMPTY-GRAPHS): Does multigraph syntax need to support empty graphs? [RDF Graphs]
Re: RDF-ISSUE-5 (Graph Literals) nesting and belief
[JSON] JSON Serializations Lineup (ACTION-20)
- Re: [JSON] JSON Serializations Lineup (ACTION-20)
- Re: [JSON] JSON Serializations Lineup (ACTION-20)
- Re: [JSON] JSON Serializations Lineup (ACTION-20)
- Re: [JSON] JSON Serializations Lineup (ACTION-20)
IRI Whitespace?
Agenda ftf
Does Qurtle support empty graphs?
Re: [JSON] RDF collections and JSON arrays
Re: RDF-ISSUE-16 (Base JSON Grammar): What is the normative serialization of the JSON grammar? [RDF JSON]
Re: [TTL] Standardizing N-Triples
- Re: [TTL] Standardizing N-Triples
Re: [ALL] FTF presentations
RDF-ISSUE-21 (Shared Node-IDs): Can Node-IDs be shared between parts of a quad/multigraph format? [RDF Graphs]
Turtle support for Multiple Graphs, suggestion
- Re: Turtle support for Multiple Graphs, suggestion
- Re: Turtle support for Multiple Graphs, suggestion
- Re: Turtle support for Multiple Graphs, suggestion
Minutes?
Re: What *is* RDF?
Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ?
- Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ?
- Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ?
- Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ?
- Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ?
- Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ?
- Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ?
- Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ?
- Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ?
- Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ?
- Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ?
- Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ?
- Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ?
- Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ?
- Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ?
- Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ?
- Re: ISSUE-19: Should TURTLE allow triples like "[ :p 123 ]." as SPARQL does ?