- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:00:36 +0100
- To: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Hi All, I read in the logs: "PROPOSED: We understand that g-* aligns with REST, with g-box=information resource, g-snap=state of the resource (at time t), g-text=representation of the state of the resource (at time t)" -1 A g-text is a representation of a mathematical set of triples, and that is either associate with a g-box or not. That's as far as it goes, introducing some notion of state will only serve to hinder in the future (consider auth* where the same g-box has multiple states at the same time for different people). Also, g-text != REST Resource Representation, consider RDFa documents which /contain/ a g-text but also a chunk of say HTML. There is no need to define anything that can't be seen with a story that doesn't cover all use-cases - it's as simple as we work with representations (g-text's) of mathematical sets of triples, and sometimes they are associated with an IRI (the name of an IR/g-box). Best, Nathan
Received on Thursday, 14 April 2011 12:01:54 UTC