- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 14:11:30 +0100
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: public-rdf-wg <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
> So the basic w3.org website remains CVS-backed, as I understand it. > For most group Web pages, the Wiki seems a reasonable alternative, > especially for freeform / rough notes work. > > For the actual specs and test case repository, I'd like to give > Mercurial a go. Can't claim to be an advocate but I'm quite liking > using Git lately, and the two systems are similar > (http://www.w3.org/blog/systeam/2010/06/16/why_we_chose_mercurial_as_our_dvcs/ > ). +1 for hg and for those who still don't believe in DVCS I'd suggest reading [1] - esp. the 00 section ;) Cheers, Michael [1] http://hginit.com/ -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 495730 http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ http://sw-app.org/about.html On 29 Apr 2011, at 14:03, Dan Brickley wrote: > On 29 April 2011 14:51, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote: >> Thinking about it some more, I think respec is almost entirely >> orthogonal to revdoc (my publication-from-the-wiki system); they >> overlap >> in generating the boilerplate at the top of the document, but >> revdoc can >> just overwrite respec's boilerplate if necessary, and rewrite the >> links >> during publication as necessary as well. >> >> So, I think the real questions are: >> >> 1. Version control: CVS, Mercurial, or Wiki? > > So the basic w3.org website remains CVS-backed, as I understand it. > For most group Web pages, the Wiki seems a reasonable alternative, > especially for freeform / rough notes work. > > For the actual specs and test case repository, I'd like to give > Mercurial a go. Can't claim to be an advocate but I'm quite liking > using Git lately, and the two systems are similar > (http://www.w3.org/blog/systeam/2010/06/16/why_we_chose_mercurial_as_our_dvcs/ > ). > >> 2. Authoring format: Mediawiki markup, or HTML5-with-<sections>. >> This >> includes how the bibliography is done. > > Is there a reasonable stable XHTML-friendly flavour of HTML5? > > Dan > >> I have no opinion, myself, on these questions. >> >> -- Sandro >> >> >> >> >
Received on Friday, 29 April 2011 13:11:59 UTC