- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 16:59:21 +0200
- To: Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: <david.wood@talis.com>, <danbri@danbri.org>, <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Apr 20, 2011, at 16:19 , Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider wrote: <snip/> > > I'm still trying to figure out what possible normative change to the RDF > semantics could possibly be involved. > Though I am not a semantic guru, my feeling is: none. The whole Skolemization discussion, in my mind, is to say "if your RDF environment wants to do skolemization [with these and these constraints that we discussed] then you SHOULD do it this and this way". This is an additional, possibly not even normative, part of the document. I may have missed something... I. > Perhaps there would be a change to the RDF Semantics document, but that > is different. It might also be that the discussion of skolemization as > it applies to RDF stores belongs to some other document. > > peter > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Wednesday, 20 April 2011 14:59:00 UTC