Re: genid:

On Apr 19, 2011, at 14:40 , Andy Seaborne wrote:

> 
> 
> On 19/04/11 11:59, Ivan Herman wrote:
>> 
>> On Apr 19, 2011, at 12:15 , Andy Seaborne wrote:
>> 
>> <snip/>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I don't worry about dereferencability so prefer "genid:"
>> 
>> I think there was a general feeling at the f2f that everybody would
>> prefer this, except that... per Sandro, it took 10 years to get the
>> tag: schema through IETF, so having a genid: scheme through IETF
>> would be a nightmare, let alone that it may not be done by the time
>> this working group closes:-(
> 
> (Minor, not urgent)
> 
> For the genid: URI scheme:
> 
> 1/ Is it only for bNodes?  

yes

> "genid" reads as if it's for any generated id; there are other schemes already + risk of clashes.
> 
> 2/ Why not a URN NID? <urn:bnode:...>    Is registration easier?
> 

I do not know:-(

Ivan

> 	Andy
> 
>> 
>> Ivan
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> -- currently provide support for<_:...>  to put bNodes in a
>>> different space to URIs while reusing/abusing the syntax.
>>> 
>>> Andy
>>> 
>>> FYI:
>>> 
>>> Registry for well-known:
>>> http://www.iana.org/assignments/well-known-uris/well-known-uris.xml
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
> Registration list:
>>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/wellknown-uri-review/current/maillist.html
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home:
>> http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key:
>> http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF:
>> http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf