- From: Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 07:21:20 -0400
- To: <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- CC: <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> Subject: Re: [JSON] Tiny Proposal Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 18:55:44 -0500 [...] >>> There are currently three JSON grammar serializations, which one >>> should this Working Group use as the basis for the RDF/JSON >>> serialization: >>> >>> * RFC4627: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4627.txt * ECMA-262 5th >>> Edition: >>> http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/files/ECMA-ST/ECMA-262.pdf >>> * json.org: http://json.org/ >> >> How do they differ? Are there real world examples of collisions? > > I thought that Peter asserted that they differ - I don't know how they > differ. Perhaps an allusion to the backslash-escaping "/" when you don't > need to? > > -- manu The details are blissfully receeding into my subconscious, but I seem to remember something about certain non-ASCII UNICODE characters being allowed unescaped in one but not in the other. peter
Received on Wednesday, 6 April 2011 11:22:10 UTC