Well, it is possible to derive contradictions in RDFS all by itself, so the answer to your question is obvious. peter From: William Waites <ww@styx.org> Subject: Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 13:02:31 -0500 > Apologies for top-posting, writing from my phone. > > I generally agree and have been thinking about the minimum that you have > to take from owl to be able to derive contradictions using rdfs. The use > case for this is debugging - detecting modelling errors. I think > owl:disjointFrom is in the list. SameAs definitely isn't. Despite its > clear analytical meaning for all practical purposes it means > RelevantlySimilarTo and should not be taken literally except perhaps in > some very well defined limited domains... > > CheersReceived on Thursday, 7 April 2011 13:32:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:05 UTC