- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:36:22 +0100
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 27/04/11 22:20, Dan Brickley wrote: > On Wednesday, 27 April 2011, Steve Harris<steve.harris@garlik.com> wrote: >> On 2011-04-27, at 17:51, Richard Cyganiak >>> Personally I'm a fan of .well-known/skolem :-) Obscure, but once you know what they are, you'll recognize them. genid is too boring. bnode confuses some people. >> >> I think "skolem" is a pretty obscure piece of jargon. >> > > Perhaps we should bear in mind that, While obscure, it is currently > pretty easy to search for. > > If 1000s of linked data servers start adding the word 'skolem' to urls > about random obscure topics, Skolemisation could become even more > obscure. > > Not sure I want that on my conscience! > > Genid +1 > Bnode -1 > Skolem -1 I think "genid" is too generic -- "id generation" and URIs from ids, happens in other situations like keys in data. A name that is indicates to URI-izing bNodes is my preference. Andy > > Dan >
Received on Thursday, 28 April 2011 08:36:52 UTC