- From: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@insa-lyon.fr>
- Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 10:12:03 +0200
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
All, I remind you what the resolution for ISSUE-12 says: "Mark xs:string as archaic for use in RDF, recommending use of plain literals instead. Recommend that systems silently convert xs:string data to plain literals." By marking xs:string as archaic, we say "Do not use xs:string". I repeat what I said: it means that I am not welcome to say: :myProperty rdfs:range xs:string . Other people agreed that this triple is perfectly fine. I am sure that it is not the intention of most people to forbid this. It seems that the only problem with xs:string is when it is used as the datatype of a literal, like "RDF"^^xs:string . I propose to cancel this resolution and make a new proposal: "Recommend that publishers use plain literals instead of xs:string typed literals and tell systems to silently convert xs:string literals to plain literals without language tag." This is very different from marking anything, like rdf:Alt, as archaic. If the group insists to mark xs:string as archaic, I'll formally object. AZ Le 20/04/2011 23:22, Richard Cyganiak a écrit : > On 20 Apr 2011, at 18:15, Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider wrote: >> It turns out that the RDF Semantics document already contains wording in >> Section 5.1 about the equivalence of plain literals and xsd:string >> literals. Any change to the document to indicate that xsd:string >> literals are considered to be archaic and that plain literals should be >> used instead would look similar to the wording for anything else the WG >> considers to be archaic. > > Related here is Section 6.5.1 of RDF Concepts& Abstract Syntax, which states that two literals are equal if and only if they are equal in lexical form, datatype URI, and language tag [1]. > > Not suggesting any particular course of action, just pointing out related text. > > Best, > Richard > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/#section-Literal-Equality > > >> >> I claim, therefore, that ACTION-27 is done, and have marked it as >> pending approval. >> >> peter >> >> PS: I think that ISSUE-12 should be marked as closed, but that's not my >> call. >> -- Antoine Zimmermann Researcher at: Laboratoire d'InfoRmatique en Image et Systèmes d'information Database Group 7 Avenue Jean Capelle 69621 Villeurbanne Cedex France Tel: +33(0)4 72 43 61 74 - Fax: +33(0)4 72 43 87 13 Lecturer at: Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon 20 Avenue Albert Einstein 69621 Villeurbanne Cedex France antoine.zimmermann@insa-lyon.fr http://zimmer.aprilfoolsreview.com/
Received on Thursday, 21 April 2011 08:12:34 UTC