- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 11:16:44 +0200
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On Apr 20, 2011, at 17:01 , Sandro Hawke wrote: > On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 14:50 +0200, Ivan Herman wrote: >> >>> 2/ Why not a URN NID? <urn:bnode:...> Is registration easier? >>> >> >> I do not know :-( > > Yes, I think it's easier, but it seems vaguely useless/silly to have the > "urn" in there as well. It probably makes sense to try for bnode: > first and see what kind of pushback we get, if we're going this route. > > (and tag: didn't take "10 years", Sorry for stretching the truth a little bit:-) I. > but ... it did take a lot longer than > I would have expected.) > > -- Sandro > > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Friday, 22 April 2011 09:15:55 UTC