- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 10:23:06 +0100
- To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>, RDF Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
On 8 Apr 2011, at 10:05, Steve Harris wrote: >> rdf:Seq does have some merit, and some serious 'in the wild' usage. > > Agreed. While far from perfect, in some situations it's preferable to RDF Lists. Can you give examples where rdf:Seq is preferable to rdf:List? Cheers, Richard
Received on Friday, 8 April 2011 09:23:39 UTC