- From: David Wood <david.wood@talis.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 07:40:00 -0400
- To: Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Cc: <danbri@danbri.org>, <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Apr 19, 2011, at 04:09, Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider wrote: > From: David Wood <david.wood@talis.com> > Subject: Re: Skolemization and RDF Semantics > Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 15:35:23 -0500 > >> On Apr 15, 2011, at 15:35, Dan Brickley wrote: >> >>> On 15 April 2011 21:29, David Wood <dpw@talis.com> wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> Ivan and IIRC Steve or Richard tried to convince me that >> Skolemization is already mentioned and allowed in the 2004 version of >> the RDF Semantics. I can't find it. Can someone please enlighten me? >> Thanks. >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/#prf >> >> Thanks. In the intervening conversation, I didn't see anyone mention >> that this is an informative section (and thus not normative). I suggest >> that the lack of clear guidance has caused sufficient pain to result in >> a normative change to the RDF Semantics in our eventual update. >> >> Regards, >> Dave > > I'm not sure just what change to the RDF sematics you think is warranted > here. I don't think we know that yet. Once we have a resolution on Skolemization I'd like to see that resolution reflected normatively in the part of the RDF Semantics doc that discusses it. Regards, Dave > > peter
Received on Wednesday, 20 April 2011 11:40:30 UTC