- From: Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:51:04 -0400
- To: <danbri@danbri.org>
- CC: <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>, <david.wood@talis.com>
[TO hopefully get this onto tracker.] From: "Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com> Subject: Re: first cut at proposing closure for the RDFCore legacy issue list Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:48:47 -0400 (EDT) >> rdf-plain-and-xml-literals: An XML literal without markup, e.g. "foo" >> should denote the same thing as the plain literal "foo". >> >> RESOLVE: Close (duplicate) - currently under discussion in RDF WG> > > The RDF semantics indicate that the value space of rdf:XMLLiteral is > disjoint from the set of Unicode strings. > > From RDF Concepts: > > The value space is a set of entities, called XML values, which is: > * disjoint from the lexical space; > * disjoint from the value space of any XML schema datatype [XML-SCHEMA2]; > * disjoint from the set of Unicode character strings [UNICODE] strings; > * and in 1:1 correspondence with the lexical space. > > so > > RESOLVE: Close as NO!!! > > I don't know why the last WG decided to punt here. > > peter
Received on Thursday, 14 April 2011 14:51:55 UTC