- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2011 23:13:46 +0100
- To: Alex Hall <alexhall@revelytix.com>
- CC: antoine.zimmermann@insa-lyon.fr, public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Alex Hall wrote: > I'd say this is a different direction from my proposal, the fundamental > difference being that my graphs and graph map are invariant over time and > that the presence of an <IRI,G> pair in a dataset is making an assertion as > to the (partial) content of the graph mapped by that IRI. The reason I say > partial is that in the open world, we can never assume to have a full > description of any resource, and I extend that to include graphs named with > IRIs. Slight worry here, reading between the lines (perhaps) it indicates to me that you're saying a set of triples describes a resource which is a graph, and further, that any statements made about a resource which is a graph, are part of that graph. ?
Received on Friday, 8 April 2011 22:15:01 UTC