- From: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 11:43:00 -0500
- To: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
I note in passing that the Proposed WG Decision dated 14 April has the consequence that the IRi associated with a graph in SPARQL cannot be used inside an RDF triple to reliably refer to the graph. This means in particular that uses such as those contemplated in http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/TF-Graphs/RDF-Datasets-Proposal, which use the SPARQL name as the object in an 'imports' triple, are ruled out by this decision. Pat On Apr 13, 2011, at 4:29 AM, RDF Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > > ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? > > http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/30 > > Raised by: > On product: > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Thursday, 14 April 2011 16:43:31 UTC