- From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 19:16:38 +0100
- To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- CC: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>, antoine.zimmermann@insa-lyon.fr, public-rdf-wg <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Steve Harris wrote: > On 2011-04-17, at 17:55, Sandro Hawke wrote: >> Of course, this is OWL not SPARQL. I don't see any good way to deal >> with this in SPARQL. I don't really understand how datatype() and >> such are supposed to work in SPARQL -- are stores really supposed to >> remember which values came in as xs:int vs xs:integer? > > Yes. Out of interest, what practical difference does it make? I'm racking my brains but struggling to think of one, other than perhaps a graph signing / encryption case for ground graphs? Best, Nathan
Received on Sunday, 17 April 2011 18:17:14 UTC