- From: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>
- Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 13:39:08 +0200
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- CC: "nathan@webr3.org" <nathan@webr3.org>, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 04/06/2011 05:14 AM, Pat Hayes wrote: > We might want to think about incorporating some version of sameAs > into RDFS, as this seems to be fundamental to linked data and also > widely misused. Having the real meaning of equality exposed in the > RDF standard itself might be doing the world a favor. (?) +1e99 it is a shame to have to rely on OWL to have some notion of equality... While we are at it, I guess inverseProperty would be a nice addition to RDFS as well, but this is way less important than incorporating sameAs. pa > > Pat > > >> >> -> Primer - needed if we have well written serialization spec's w/ >> examples and a coherent "core" document? - seems like a large >> domain w/ 3 syntaxes? (and ties to RDFa, SPARQL etc) - any ties in >> with RDF API? >> >> -> Serializations -> Turtle -> RDF/XML -> JSON >> >> -> Test Cases - should be per serialization? >> >> - where do "graphs" surface in these specs? - can graphs even be a >> separate document? - linked data? do we cover or account for it, do >> a note, anything? >> >> Best, >> >> Nathan >> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------ IHMC > (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 40 South Alcaniz St. > (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 > 4440 fax FL 32502 (850)291 0667 > mobile phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 6 April 2011 11:40:12 UTC