- From: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>
- Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 17:12:08 +0200
- To: William Waites <ww@styx.org>
- CC: RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
William, On 04/05/2011 04:06 PM, William Waites wrote: > Wanting to put this out for discussion in advance of the > teleconference. > > As I see it the main reason for having graphs as a first-class > datatype in RDF is to be able to make statements about them and to > answer questions about them. Simple questions are things like, what > are the matches for this pattern in this graph? Or, where do triples > that match this pattern come from and what can be said about their > sources? it seems to me that you are in fact talking about two different things here: * "graphs as a first-class datatype in RDF" sounds to me like you want to name g-snaps (and your subsequent examples as well) * "where do those triples come from" sounds like you want to name g-boxes (provenance) pa
Received on Tuesday, 5 April 2011 15:12:33 UTC