- From: Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 12:35:30 -0400
- To: <antoine.zimmermann@insa-lyon.fr>
- CC: <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
From: Antoine Zimmermann <antoine.zimmermann@insa-lyon.fr> Subject: Re: RDF Recommendation Set comments (re agenda for 6th April) Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 10:40:37 -0500 > Le 07/04/2011 15:31, Peter Frederick Patel-Schneider a écrit : >> Well, it is possible to derive contradictions in RDFS all by itself, so >> the answer to your question is obvious. > > > Then, let us consider RDFS without datatypes. In this case, it is not > possible to derive contradictions. However, by adding owl:sameAs, it is > possible to derive contradictions even in absence of datatypes. > > :x owl:sameAs "abc" . > :x owl:sameAs "xyz" . > > or, even better: > > rdf:type owl:sameAs owl:sameAs . > > > AZ. It would be interesting to see the derivation of inconsistency from the last. peter
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2011 16:36:16 UTC