- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 18:55:09 +0200
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Cc: RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Pat, sorry, but you will have to explain (me) what the problem is. Ivan ---- Ivan Herman web: http://www.ivan-herman.net mobile: +31 64 1044 153 On 14 Apr 2011, at 18:43, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us> wrote: > I note in passing that the Proposed WG Decision dated 14 April has the consequence that the IRi associated with a graph in SPARQL cannot be used inside an RDF triple to reliably refer to the graph. This means in particular that uses such as those contemplated in > http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/TF-Graphs/RDF-Datasets-Proposal, which use the SPARQL name as the object in an 'imports' triple, are ruled out by this decision. > > Pat > > On Apr 13, 2011, at 4:29 AM, RDF Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > >> >> ISSUE-30: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs? >> >> http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/30 >> >> Raised by: >> On product: >> >> >> >> >> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 > 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office > Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax > FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile > phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes > > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 14 April 2011 16:55:03 UTC