- From: fensel <dieter.fensel@ontotext.com>
- Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 17:19:23 +0200
- To: Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>, Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Cc: "nathan@webr3.org" <nathan@webr3.org>,RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
At 13:39 06.04.2011, Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote: >On 04/06/2011 05:14 AM, Pat Hayes wrote: > > We might want to think about incorporating some version of sameAs > > into RDFS, as this seems to be fundamental to linked data and also > > widely misused. Having the real meaning of equality exposed in the > > RDF standard itself might be doing the world a favor. (?) > >+1e99 I think this may be a very bad idea. You would force all languages layering on top of RDF to include equality. There are reasons to prevent equality because it turns unification from a syntactical operation into reasoning. Dieter
Received on Wednesday, 6 April 2011 15:24:08 UTC