Re: RDF-ISSUE-25 (Deprecate Reification): Should we deprecate (RDF 2004) reification? [Cleanup tasks] from fensel on 2011-04-09 (public-rdf-wg@w3.org from April 2011)

From: fensel <dieter.fensel@ontotext.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 16:30:07 +0200
To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>,Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>,"Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>, David Wood <dpw@talis.com>,RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <E1Q8ZC5-00062R-6B@maggie.w3.org>

At 21:12 08.04.2011, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
>Now you are suggesting that reification could be the way to address 
>the multigraph stuff. I find this perverse and strongly object to 
>the proposal. I think discussing it at all is a waste of working 
>group resources.

We could simply going to call it differently: basic multi-graph stuff 
instead of reifcation (and the charter is met twice)!

Received on Saturday, 9 April 2011 14:31:23 UTC