On Apr 8, 2011, at 11:23 , Richard Cyganiak wrote: > On 8 Apr 2011, at 10:05, Steve Harris wrote: >>> rdf:Seq does have some merit, and some serious 'in the wild' usage. >> >> Agreed. While far from perfect, in some situations it's preferable to RDF Lists. > > Can you give examples where rdf:Seq is preferable to rdf:List? > Although a pain even with rdf:Seq, it seems to be easier to reproduce the order of items after a SPARQL query if the data uses Seq rather than lists... Ivan > Cheers, > Richard ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Friday, 8 April 2011 09:29:29 UTC