- From: William Waites <ww@styx.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 12:35:21 +0200
- To: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
- Cc: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
* [2011-04-22 01:02:58 +0100] Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> écrit: ] d) struggle to interoperate, even behind the web interface I think this point is quite important. In principle I agree with Pat that RDF is a wire format and data model and systems can internally do what they like. Except that most real systems will actually be made up of pieces from different vendors and what would normally be unconstrained internal communication ends up in practice following the public protocol because the vendors are, rightly, concerned about interoperability. So in practice the constraints in the spec leak into the private sphere. Cheers, -w -- William Waites <mailto:ww@styx.org> http://river.styx.org/ww/ <sip:ww@styx.org> F4B3 39BF E775 CF42 0BAB 3DF0 BE40 A6DF B06F FD45
Received on Friday, 22 April 2011 10:35:46 UTC