Re: A use case for graph literals: Schemapedia (ISSUE-5)

On 8 Apr 2011, at 16:50, Antoine Zimmermann wrote:
> Then the question is, how do we define immutable g-boxes.

I already answered this further down in the same email:

>> <my-immutable-g-box>  { ... content of the immutable g-box ...}
>> <my-immutable-g-box>  a ex:VersionedSnapshot; ex:timestamp "2011-04-08"^^xsd:date
>> (where ex: is a use case specific vocabulary that we don't have to define in this WG)
>> For making explicit the triples inside a g-box (mutable or not), all you really need is the ability to write down <IRI, g-snap> pairs.


Received on Friday, 8 April 2011 16:08:22 UTC