- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 11:01:10 -0400
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 14:50 +0200, Ivan Herman wrote:
>
> > 2/ Why not a URN NID? <urn:bnode:...> Is registration easier?
> >
>
> I do not know :-(
Yes, I think it's easier, but it seems vaguely useless/silly to have the
"urn" in there as well. It probably makes sense to try for bnode:
first and see what kind of pushback we get, if we're going this route.
(and tag: didn't take "10 years", but ... it did take a lot longer than
I would have expected.)
-- Sandro
Received on Wednesday, 20 April 2011 15:01:23 UTC