Sunday, 30 September 2007
Saturday, 29 September 2007
- Processing literals
- Re: update HTML fragment specification for RDFa?
- discussion of QNames in content in RDFa documents?
- update HTML fragment specification for RDFa?
- Re: RDFa Syntax Document Ready for Review
- Re: [POWDER-DR] Comments regarding RDFa
Friday, 28 September 2007
- Re: Firefox/Operator hAudio RDFa demo
- Re: ISSUE-10: RESOLVED - XHTML 1.1 namespace doesn't end in / or #
- Re: ISSUE-10: RESOLVED - XHTML 1.1 namespace doesn't end in / or #
- Re: Minutes 2007-09-27
- Re: Small Bug Fixes to RDFa Syntax Document
Thursday, 27 September 2007
- Small Bug Fixes to RDFa Syntax Document
- ISSUE-10: RESOLVED - XHTML 1.1 namespace doesn't end in / or #
- Minutes 2007-09-27
- Re: [POWDER-DR] Comments regarding RDFa
- Re: [POWDER-DR] Comments regarding RDFa
- Re: Updated Editor's Draft of rdfa-syntax
- Re: Updated Editor's Draft of rdfa-syntax
- Re: [POWDER-DR] Comments regarding RDFa
- Re: Updated Editor's Draft of rdfa-syntax
- Re: Updated Editor's Draft of rdfa-syntax
- Re: Updated Editor's Draft of rdfa-syntax
- RE: [POWDER-DR] Comments regarding RDFa
- Re: Updated Editor's Draft of rdfa-syntax
- Re: [POWDER-DR] Comments regarding RDFa
- Re: Updated Editor's Draft of rdfa-syntax
- [POWDER-DR] Comments regarding RDFa
- Re: Updated Editor's Draft of rdfa-syntax
Wednesday, 26 September 2007
- Re: VOTING on the non-binding resolutions - please read and respond ASAP
- [RDFa] ISSUE-43: Primer should link to URIs of assumed namespaces
- Agenda for Telecon Thursday, 1500 UTC
- Firefox/Operator hAudio RDFa demo
- Re: RDFa usage in POWDER
- Re: RDFa usage in POWDER
- RDFa usage in POWDER
- Re: an issue with prefix-less curies (also comment on the syntax document)
- Re: an issue with prefix-less curies (also comment on the syntax document)
- Re: an issue with prefix-less curies (also comment on the syntax document)
- Re: an issue with prefix-less curies (also comment on the syntax document)
- Re: an issue with prefix-less curies (also comment on the syntax document)
- Re: Yet another RDFa experience
- Re: Yet another RDFa experience
- Re: an issue with prefix-less curies (also comment on the syntax document)
- Re: an issue with prefix-less curies (also comment on the syntax document)
- Re: Yet another RDFa experience
- Re: Yet another RDFa experience
- Re: Yet another RDFa experience
- Re: Yet another RDFa experience
- Re: an issue with prefix-less curies (also comment on the syntax document)
- Re: an issue with prefix-less curies (also comment on the syntax document)
Tuesday, 25 September 2007
- Re: Yet another RDFa experience
- Re: Yet another RDFa experience
- Re: Yet another RDFa experience
- Re: Yet another RDFa experience
- Re: an issue with prefix-less curies (also comment on the syntax document)
- Re: an issue with prefix-less curies (also comment on the syntax document)
- an issue with prefix-less curies (also comment on the syntax document)
- distiller bookmarklet
- Re: RDFa Syntax Document Ready for Review
- Re: Yet another RDFa experience
- Re: RDFa Syntax Document Ready for Review
- Re: RDFa Syntax Document Ready for Review
- Re: RDFa Syntax Document Ready for Review
- Yet another RDFa experience
- Re: Updated Editor's Draft of rdfa-syntax
Monday, 24 September 2007
- RE: Updated Editor's Draft of rdfa-syntax
- feedback on RDFa primer
- Re: Updated Editor's Draft of rdfa-syntax
- Re: Updated Editor's Draft of rdfa-syntax
- Re: my action on conformance
- Re: RDFa Syntax Document Ready for Review
- Re: my action on conformance
- Re: my action on conformance
- Re: my action on conformance
- RE: [ALL] Review requested for "Cool URIs"
Friday, 21 September 2007
- RDFa Syntax Document Ready for Review
- Re: RDFa Primer Ready for Review
- Re: RDFa Primer Ready for Review
- Re: RDFa Primer Ready for Review
- Re: RDFa Primer Ready for Review
- Re: RDFa Primer Ready for Review
- RDFa Primer Ready for Review
Thursday, 20 September 2007
- meeting record: 2007-09-20 RDFa Task Force
- Re: my action on conformance
- Re: my action on conformance
- Re: VOTING on the non-binding resolutions - please read and respond ASAP
- Re: my action on conformance
- Re: VOTING on the non-binding resolutions - please read and respond ASAP
- Re: what does @instanceof refer to
- Re: what does @instanceof refer to
- Re: what does @instanceof refer to
- Re: VOTING on the non-binding resolutions - please read and respond ASAP
- Re: VOTING on the non-binding resolutions - please read and respond ASAP
- Re: VOTING on the non-binding resolutions - please read and respond ASAP
- Re: VOTING on the non-binding resolutions - please read and respond ASAP
- Re: my action on conformance
- RE: my action on conformance
- Re: my action on conformance
- Fwd: my action on conformance
- Re: my action on conformance
- Telecon Thursday, 1500 UTC
- VOTING on the non-binding resolutions - please read and respond ASAP
Wednesday, 19 September 2007
- my action on conformance
- what does @instanceof refer to
- RE: Updated Editor's Draft of rdfa-syntax
- RE: new editor's draft of Primer
Tuesday, 18 September 2007
- Updated Editor's Draft of rdfa-syntax
- new editor's draft of Primer
- Re: RDFa-Syntax and xhtml-rdfa
- Re: RDFa-Syntax and xhtml-rdfa
- RDFa-Syntax and xhtml-rdfa
Saturday, 15 September 2007
Friday, 14 September 2007
- meeting record: 2007-09-14 RDFa TF telecon
- Re: RDFa serializer?
- Re: Fine-tuning CURIEs (reply #2 :-)
- Re: comments on RDFa Syntax
- Kurt Cagle on RDFa and CURIEs
- Re: RDFa Syntax document technical issues
- Re: RDFa Syntax document technical issues
- Re: comments on RDFa Syntax
- Re: RDFa Syntax document technical issues
- Re: Fine-tuning CURIEs (reply #2 :-)
- Re: Fine-tuning CURIEs (reply #2 :-)
- Re: Fine-tuning CURIEs (reply #2 :-)
- Re: Fine-tuning CURIEs (reply #2 :-)
- Re: Issue on the latest syntax document: placement of @instanceof
- Re: Fine-tuning CURIEs (reply #2 :-)
- Re: Fine-tuning CURIEs (reply #2 :-)
- Re: RDFa Syntax document technical issues
- telecon in a few hours, 1500 UTC, *Friday*.
- comments on RDFa Syntax
- Re: RDFa in XHTML Feedback/Edits
- Re: RDFa Syntax document technical issues
- RDFa Syntax document technical issues
- Re: RDFa Primer comments
- Re: RDFa Primer comments
- Re: Fine-tuning CURIEs (reply #2 :-)
- Re: Issue on the latest syntax document: placement of @instanceof
- Re: Fine-tuning CURIEs (reply #2 :-)
- Re: RDFa Primer comments
Thursday, 13 September 2007
- Re: Fine-tuning CURIEs (reply #2 :-)
- Re: RDFa Primer comments
- Re: RDFa Primer comments
- Re: RDFa Primer comments
- RDFa Primer comments
- Re: Syntax Document Editor's Draft update for review
- Re: Syntax Document Editor's Draft update for review
- Re: RDFa in XHTML Feedback/Edits
- Re: Fine-tuning CURIEs
- Re: New RDFa profile, XSLT1 transformation and parser released
- comments on 12-sep RDFa Primer ED
- comments on 12-sep RDFa Syntax ED
- Summarizing comments on syntax doc
- Testing, please ignore
- Re: Syntax Document Editor's Draft update for review
- Re: New RDFa profile, XSLT1 transformation and parser released
- Re: RDFa in XHTML Feedback/Edits
- RDFa in XHTML Feedback/Edits
- next telecon - Friday 1500 UTC
Wednesday, 12 September 2007
- RE: Syntax Document Editor's Draft update for review
- Re: New RDFa profile, XSLT1 transformation and parser released
- Re: New RDFa profile, XSLT1 transformation and parser released
- Syntax Document Editor's Draft update for review
- New RDFa profile, XSLT1 transformation and parser released
- Re: Issue on the latest syntax document: placement of @instanceof (Wed morning:-)
- Re: Issue on the latest syntax document: placement of @instanceof (Wed morning:-)
- Re: [RDFa TC] TC 29 and normalizing spaces of the children of an element used as a property value.
- Re: [RDFa TC] TC 29 and normalizing spaces of the children of an element used as a property value.
- RE: [RDFa TC] TC 29 and normalizing spaces of the children of an element used as a property value.
- Re: Issue on the latest syntax document: placement of @instanceof (Wed morning:-)
- Re: [RDFa TC] TC 29 and normalizing spaces of the children of an element used as a property value.
- Re: Issue on the latest syntax document: placement of @instanceof (Wed morning:-)
- Re: Fine-tuning CURIEs (reply #2 :-)
- Re: Issue on the latest syntax document: placement of @instanceof (Wed morning:-)
- Re: Fine-tuning CURIEs (reply #2 :-)
- Re: [RDFa TC] TC 29 and normalizing spaces of the children of an element used as a property value.
- Re: Fine-tuning CURIEs (reply #2 :-)
- Re: Fine-tuning CURIEs (reply #2 :-)
- RE: Fine-tuning CURIEs (reply #2 :-)
- [RDFa TC] TC 29 and normalizing spaces of the children of an element used as a property value.
- Re: Fine-tuning CURIEs (reply #2 :-)
- Re: Procedural question on [Fwd: Re: Fine-tuning CURIEs]
Tuesday, 11 September 2007
- Re: Primer Update (feedback)
- Re: Issue on the latest syntax document: placement of @instanceof
- Re: Procedural question on [Fwd: Re: Fine-tuning CURIEs]
- Re: Procedural question on [Fwd: Re: Fine-tuning CURIEs]
- Re: Procedural question on [Fwd: Re: Fine-tuning CURIEs]
- Re: Procedural question on [Fwd: Re: Fine-tuning CURIEs]
- Procedural question on [Fwd: Re: Fine-tuning CURIEs]
- Re: Fine-tuning CURIEs
- Re: Fine-tuning CURIEs
- Re: Fine-tuning CURIEs
- Re: Fine-tuning CURIEs
- Re: Fine-tuning CURIEs
- Re: Fine-tuning CURIEs
- Re: Issue on the latest syntax document: placement of @instanceof
- Re: integrated Manu's edits into the Primer
- Fine-tuning CURIEs
- Re: Issue on the latest syntax document: placement of @instanceof
- Re: Primer Update (feedback)
- Primer Update
Monday, 10 September 2007
- [RDFa TC] Re: Updating RDFa_GRDDL stylesheet - progress report
- RE: Updating RDFa_GRDDL stylesheet - progress report
- integrated Manu's edits into the Primer
Sunday, 9 September 2007
- Re: Updating RDFa_GRDDL stylesheet - progress report
- RE: Updating RDFa_GRDDL stylesheet - progress report
- Re: Issue on setting of [current resource] (addendum to Re: Issue on the latest syntax document: setting of [chaining])
- Updating RDFa_GRDDL stylesheet - progress report
- Re: Issue on setting of [current resource] (addendum to Re: Issue on the latest syntax document: setting of [chaining])
- Re: Issue on the latest syntax document: setting of [chaining]
- summary of my previous issues for the editors
- Issue on the latest syntax document: placement of @instanceof
- Issue on setting of [current resource] (addendum to Re: Issue on the latest syntax document: setting of [chaining])
- Issue on the latest syntax document: setting of [chaining]
- Re: Why is there no RDFa syntax working draft?
Friday, 7 September 2007
- Re: RDFa2RDF proxy
- Re: Firefox 3 UI concept for Semantic Data
- Re: RDFa2RDF proxy
- Re: Firefox 3 UI concept for Semantic Data
- RE: RDFa2RDF proxy
- Firefox 3 UI concept for Semantic Data
- Re: RDFa2RDF proxy
- RE: RDFa2RDF proxy
- [RDFa] Meeting record: 2007-09-06 RDFa Task Force telecon
- Re: Updated Editor's Draft available
- Re: Updated Editor's Draft available
- Ann: RDFa2RDF proxy
Thursday, 6 September 2007
- [RDFa TC] Review support tool: rdfa.debug
- More rdfa-syntax updates
- RE: Agenda for Telecon Thursday - 1500 UTC, 1100 Boston
- RDFa Syntax Document Feedback
- Re: Agenda for Telecon Thursday - 1500 UTC, 1100 Boston
- Agenda for Telecon Thursday - 1500 UTC, 1100 Boston
Wednesday, 5 September 2007
- Re: Updated Editor's Draft available
- Re: Updated Editor's Draft available
- RE: Updated Editor's Draft available
- Re: Updated Editor's Draft available
- Re: Updated Editor's Draft available
- More suggestions for rdf:type
- Re: Updated Editor's Draft available
- Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type)
- Re: Updated Editor's Draft available
- Re: update on Primer
- Re: update on Primer
- Re: update on Primer
- update on Primer
Tuesday, 4 September 2007
- Updated Editor's Draft available
- Re: Why is there no RDFa syntax working draft?
- Re: Why is there no RDFa syntax working draft?
- Re: Why is there no RDFa syntax working draft?
- Re: Why is there no RDFa syntax working draft?
- Re: Why is there no RDFa syntax working draft?
- Re: Why is there no RDFa syntax working draft?
- Re: Why is there no RDFa syntax working draft?
- RE: Why is there no RDFa syntax working draft?
- Why is there no RDFa syntax working draft?
- hAudio Case Study Appendix updated
Monday, 3 September 2007
- Re: title element, meta, h1 and rdfa
- Re: title element, meta, h1 and rdfa
- Re: title element, meta, h1 and rdfa
- Re: title element, meta, h1 and rdfa
- Re: More on the 'legacy' namespacing question
- RE: hAudio Case Study
- hAudio Case Study
- Re: title element, meta, h1 and rdfa