- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 00:58:46 -0400
- To: RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Some feedback on the RDFa Syntax document... this was my first time reading it. It took around 1.5 hours to read through the text and while some of it was out of date, it didn't seem too complicated to understand (for the intended audience). 3.1. Overview Awesome section - really helped summarize RDFa. It is a good 10,000 ft view of RDFa, IMHO. 3.3. Relating document components CURIEs are incorrect? taxo and biblio aren't defined in the opening <html> element using @xmlns. For example, you couldn't resolve the following in the example: <link rel="rdf:type" href="[taxo:topic]" /> 3.4. Global RDF statements Could we use a more verbose example? This is one of the main features of RDFa that got us interested. Could you re-use the photo example, but show how the triples can be sprinkled throughout the HTML? 4.4.1. The property attribute Missing what the generated triple should be. Is it: <#q1> dc:creator "Fyodor Dostoevsky". 5.1.1. Without datatype Both examples are supposed to generate plain literals now, right? 5.3. Reification I went into this section not knowing what Reification was... and I still don't quite understand what it is, or why we need it :) - I understand that LINK and META affects the subject resolution, and it's useful to create triples about links about documents... but is it common for people to mark up this kind of data in their HTML? Seems a bit complex for a Reification-noob like myself. 6.2 FOAF I didn't think that the subject could be established using @id. However, the triples generated look as if @id was used to establish the subject of all of the foaf:Person statements? 7.2. Evaluation Context ...The [language]. Note that there is no default language. By [language], do you mean xml:lang? If there is no default language, wouldn't the context be invalid if it were not specified? Or should it default to the application default language or "en"? I think I know the answer to this question, but it would be good to have it stated explicitly in the syntax document. -- manu
Received on Thursday, 6 September 2007 04:58:52 UTC