W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > September 2007

Re: Yet another RDFa experience

From: Martin McEvoy <martin@weborganics.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:32:11 +0100
To: Simone Onofri <simone.onofri@gmail.com>
Cc: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>, Fabien Gandon <Fabien.Gandon@sophia.inria.fr>
Message-Id: <1190763131.13600.16.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 00:31 +0200, Simone Onofri wrote:
> > This Is great I have been having problems all weekend with this RDFa+RSS
> > [1], I have got as far as transforming to RSS using the distiller [2],
> > but my tests have produced some wild results, which I have put down to
> > the markup in my test (and me just getting to grips with RDFa), anyway
> > after looking at your examples, your markup contains minimal html and
> > only block elements, this probably confirms my suspicions :)
> 
> I try to compact a lot XHTML code, but suggestions is accepted.

I don't truthfully know if what you and I are trying to attempt is
possible while the GRDDL service and the Distiller still produces random
output. If the output can be tidied in some way, and put back the way it
was found then I would imagine It would be a natural thing for a
publisher to want to achieve. My own view is publishers will have to go
to much time and trouble structuring their data in RDFa, the results
should (maybe) reflect the authors input?
 
> 
> > Inspiring work Simone thanks.
> 
> Thanks Martin also Your work is interesting.

Thanks

:) Martin
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Simone
> 
> > Martin
> >
> > [1] http://weborganics.co.uk/files/RDFa-syndication-format.xhtml
> > [2] http://www.w3.org/2007/08/pyRdfa/extract?uri=http%
> > 3A//weborganics.co.uk/files/RDFa-syndication-format.xhtml
> >
Received on Tuesday, 25 September 2007 23:31:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:01:52 UTC