W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > September 2007

Re: RDFa Syntax document technical issues

From: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 14:25:15 +0200
Message-ID: <cf8107640709140525n2a6364denfec35c5e8c153249@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Mark Birbeck" <mark.birbeck@formsplayer.com>
Cc: "Ben Adida" <ben@adida.net>, "Shane McCarron" <shane@aptest.com>, "public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf. w3. org" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>

Hi Mark,

oh; I knew I forgot to look at something before I spoke this time. :]
But that's great!

Best regards,
Niklas


On 9/14/07, Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@formsplayer.com> wrote:
> Hi Niklas,
>
> > Just to be clear; was it agreed that the base element in head will be
> > intrepreted to the same affect in XHTML 1.1? So that:
> >
> >         <base href="http://example.org" />
> >     </head>
> >     <body>
> >         <div about="#me">
> >             <span property="foaf:givenname">Niklas</span>
> >             <a rel="foaf:homepage" href="/niklas">
> >         </div>
> >
> > yields:
> >
> >     <http://example.org#me>
> >         foaf:givenname "Niklas";
> >         foaf:homepage <http://example.org/niklas> .
> >
> > ? I believe so.. (Which implies that base will be peeked at RDFa
> > process startup.)
>
> Yes, that's in the syntax document. It also explicitly says that even
> if <base> comes after <link> and <meta> in the <head>, it must be
> honoured. This was added so as to draw attention to this for anyone
> who was using a SAX-style approach to the parsing.
>
> Regards,
>
> Mark
>
> --
>   Mark Birbeck, formsPlayer
>
>   mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232
>   http://www.formsPlayer.com | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com
>
>   standards. innovation.
>
Received on Friday, 14 September 2007 12:25:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:01:52 UTC