- From: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 14:25:15 +0200
- To: "Mark Birbeck" <mark.birbeck@formsplayer.com>
- Cc: "Ben Adida" <ben@adida.net>, "Shane McCarron" <shane@aptest.com>, "public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf. w3. org" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Hi Mark, oh; I knew I forgot to look at something before I spoke this time. :] But that's great! Best regards, Niklas On 9/14/07, Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@formsplayer.com> wrote: > Hi Niklas, > > > Just to be clear; was it agreed that the base element in head will be > > intrepreted to the same affect in XHTML 1.1? So that: > > > > <base href="http://example.org" /> > > </head> > > <body> > > <div about="#me"> > > <span property="foaf:givenname">Niklas</span> > > <a rel="foaf:homepage" href="/niklas"> > > </div> > > > > yields: > > > > <http://example.org#me> > > foaf:givenname "Niklas"; > > foaf:homepage <http://example.org/niklas> . > > > > ? I believe so.. (Which implies that base will be peeked at RDFa > > process startup.) > > Yes, that's in the syntax document. It also explicitly says that even > if <base> comes after <link> and <meta> in the <head>, it must be > honoured. This was added so as to draw attention to this for anyone > who was using a SAX-style approach to the parsing. > > Regards, > > Mark > > -- > Mark Birbeck, formsPlayer > > mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232 > http://www.formsPlayer.com | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com > > standards. innovation. >
Received on Friday, 14 September 2007 12:25:21 UTC