- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 08:51:34 -0500
- To: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
The TAG finding on QNames doesn't come right out and say "don't use them in attribute values and content" but it enumerates a bunch of problems when you do... http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/qnameids.html It seems worthwhile for the RDFa specs to say something along the lines of "yes, we know QNames in attribute values don't work well with canonicalization nor CSS selectors, but we think it's worth doing anyway." i.e. anticipate criticism such as this rather than deal with it as a last call comment or some such... "As it is based on the (horrid, imo) concept of qnames in content two equivalent (not identical) documents can't necessarily be styled using the same binding because the Selectors language and the DOM have no support for qnames in content." -- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Sep/0520.html -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Saturday, 29 September 2007 13:51:37 UTC