- From: Simone Onofri <simone.onofri@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 21:10:27 +0200
- To: "Shane McCarron" <shane@aptest.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf.w3.org <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Hi Shane, I'm according with You. So for point 1 and can be good also an example of a complete document using RDFa and for Processor and Agents I think a lot of people like the use of RDFa direcly with RDF and with possibily to bypass a transformation. For example, there are a mail from Dan Brickely. He try to (RDF) validate RDFa docs directy (Ivan's FOAF in the mail). This can be a nice idea. Cheers, Simone On 9/15/07, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> wrote: > > I have an action item to produce a conformance section. Typically > XHTML family specs have a conformance section that talks about document > conformance and user agent conformance. In this case I don't think we > want to talk about user agents per-se.... probably RDFa processors? > We can talk about document conformance, although I think we are > dependent upon the separate xhtml-rdfa module definition document. > That's not a bad dependency, but we can't produce our markup language > (XHTML+RDFa) without those modules. > > I will update that draft and refer to it normatively from rdfa-syntax. > Two questions: > > 1) Are there any objections to introducing a section on document > conformance that defines our markup language? Its a trivial definition > in that the modules are external so it is just XHTML 1.1 + the > appropriate module(s). > > 2) I do not think that we are in a position to define additional user > agent conformance beyond the ones defined in XHTML Modularization, but > we should reference those. Any objections? > > 3) Are there any objections to defining RDFa Processor Conformance? > > I am going to proceed assuming there are no objections. If there are, > please articulate them clearly so we can discuss on here and I will > capture them as issues in the document. > > Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 > Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 > ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com > > > >
Received on Saturday, 15 September 2007 19:11:01 UTC