W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > September 2007

Re: Conformance Section

From: Simone Onofri <simone.onofri@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 21:10:27 +0200
Message-ID: <52bd7c3d0709151210x748ace6ne2bebe9e7196c788@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Shane McCarron" <shane@aptest.com>
Cc: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf.w3.org <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>

Hi Shane,

I'm according with You. So for point 1 and can be good also an example
of a complete document using RDFa and for Processor and Agents I think
a lot of people like the use of RDFa direcly with RDF and with
possibily to bypass a transformation.

For example, there are a mail from Dan Brickely. He try to (RDF)
validate RDFa docs directy (Ivan's FOAF in the mail). This can be a
nice idea.

Cheers,

Simone

On 9/15/07, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com> wrote:
>
> I have an action item to produce a conformance section.   Typically
> XHTML family specs have a conformance section that talks about document
> conformance and user agent conformance.  In this case I don't think we
> want to talk about user agents per-se....  probably RDFa processors?
> We can talk about document conformance, although I think we are
> dependent upon the separate xhtml-rdfa module definition document.
> That's not a bad dependency, but we can't produce our markup language
> (XHTML+RDFa) without those modules.
>
> I will update that draft and refer to it normatively from rdfa-syntax.
> Two questions:
>
> 1) Are there any objections to introducing a section on document
> conformance that defines our markup language?  Its a trivial definition
> in that the modules are external so it is just XHTML 1.1 + the
> appropriate module(s).
>
> 2) I do not think that we are in a position to define additional user
> agent conformance beyond the ones defined in XHTML Modularization, but
> we should reference those.  Any objections?
>
> 3) Are there any objections to defining RDFa Processor Conformance?
>
> I am going to proceed assuming there are no objections.  If there are,
> please articulate them clearly so we can discuss on here and I will
> capture them as issues in the document.
>
> Shane P. McCarron                          Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
> Managing Director                            Fax: +1 763 786-8180
> ApTest Minnesota                            Inet: shane@aptest.com
>
>
>
>
Received on Saturday, 15 September 2007 19:11:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:01:52 UTC