W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > September 2007

Re: Updating RDFa_GRDDL stylesheet - progress report

From: Fabien Gandon <Fabien.Gandon@sophia.inria.fr>
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 23:52:59 +0200
Message-ID: <46E46B3B.7010207@sophia.inria.fr>
To: "Hausenblas, Michael" <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
CC: martin@weborganics.co.uk, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, "public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf.w3.org" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>, Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>
Thanks for the updated pointers Michael!
I now passes all the tests from 0001 to 0045 except:
 - Test 11 : the produced  triples look good but the projection fails 
and I have to check why.
 - Test 29 : in the test, the ASK specifies an additional space at the 
end of the literal value "Mark Birbeck "
                  Is it a typo or did I miss some space normalization 
subtleties ?

I also switched my @class template to @instanceof template but I did not 
test it yet.

As soon as these points are clarified, I should release a new RDFa_GRDDL 
transform together with a new GRDDL profile for it.

Cheers,

Hausenblas, Michael a écrit :
> Fabien,
>
> Good to see you're making progress ;)
>
> Regarding the TC you may be happy to hear that
> there are less issues as it may look in the first place.
>
> Just to make sure we're talking about the same document -
> (saw you're referring to eg. sec 5.1.2.1 which does not
> exists in the newest Syntax doc):
>
> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2007/ED-rdfa-syntax-20070906/
>
> is the good place to look at, and there, mainly sec. 4!
>
> So to make life easier, I suggest you take a look at
>
> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFaTC
>
> There at the very beginning, you have a link that lists
> the APPROVED TC ('list approved Test Cases ...') - some
> of the TC you're having troubles with are actually on hold.
>
> Regarding the literal/values/datatypes - thess seem 
> correct to me, looking at [1].
>
> In case you want some further support, just shout out :)
>
> Cheers,
> 	Michael
>
> BTW: I'm as well available on skype as 'mhausenblas'
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFa/LiteralObject
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>  Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
>  Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
>  JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
>  Steyrergasse 17, A-8010 Graz, AUSTRIA
> ---------------------------------------------------------- 
>
>   
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Fabien Gandon [mailto:Fabien.Gandon@sophia.inria.fr] 
>> Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2007 5:59 PM
>> To: martin@weborganics.co.uk; Ivan Herman; Hausenblas, 
>> Michael; Shane McCarron; public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf.w3.org; Ben 
>> Adida; Dave Beckett
>> Subject: Updating RDFa_GRDDL stylesheet - progress report
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am working on a new version of the RDFa_GRDDL stylesheet.
>> So far it integrates:
>>  - differences I found running a diff between my latest 
>> version and the version Dave Beckett sent me
>>  - new attributes and associated tests: resource, src
>>  
>>
>> However I have a number of questions concerning the current 
>> test suite:
>> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/
>>
>>
>> Tests 0001, 0002, 0003, 0020, 0021, 0022, 0023, 0024, 0025, 0033:
>> I failed these tests because the SPARQL query does not specify the 
>> datatype. My reading of section 5.1.1 of the syntax document 
>> is that in 
>> these cases the literal value (e.g. "Mark Birbeck", "Ben 
>> Adida") should 
>> be typed rdf:XMLLiteral since it is not in a "content" 
>> attribute. E.g. 
>> for test 0001 I produce this triple but fail the corresponding ASK:
>> <rdf:Description 
>> rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1
>> -testcases/photo1.jpg">
>> <dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" 
>> rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#XMLLi
>>     
> teral">Mark 
>   
>> Birbeck</dc:creator>
>> </rdf:Description>
>>
>> Unless I am mistaken, the SPARQL queries of these tests should either 
>> specify the datatype or use the string function of SPARQL to 
>> filter the 
>> value independently from the datatype.
>> (NB: in section "5.1.2.1. Literal from string value of meta" 
>> the example 
>> does not correspond to a tag "meta")
>>
>>
>> Test 0011:
>> 1, In my understanding "Albert Einstein" should be typed 
>> rdf:XMLLiteral
>> 2, Instead of generating
>>   E = mc<sup>2</sup>: The Most Urgent Problem of Our Time
>> I generate:
>>   E = mc<sup xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" 
>> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">2</sup>:
>>  The Most 
>> Urgent Problem of Our Time
>>
>> Any opinion on this second case? (apart from the fact that 
>> xmlns:xsi=... 
>> is useless)
>>
>>
>> Test 0028: I fail because I interpret the attribute datatype="" as an 
>> XMLLiteral datatype ; I couldn't find in the specs what the 
>> empty string 
>> should represent for a datatype
>>
>>
>> Test 0029: I fail the test because the ASK specifies an 
>> additional space 
>> in the literal value "Mark Birbeck " which I don't have since I 
>> normalize embedded text when they have a datatype.
>>
>>
>> In addition if there have been any changes of the spec lately that I 
>> should be aware of please do not hesitate to mention them.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> -- 
>> Fabien - http://ns.inria.fr/fabien.gandon/
>>
>>     

-- 
Fabien - http://ns.inria.fr/fabien.gandon/
Received on Sunday, 9 September 2007 21:53:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:01:52 UTC