W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > September 2007

Re: title element, meta, h1 and rdfa

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 10:54:00 +0900
Message-Id: <C6F3EC83-C36D-483E-BFBB-E1E271D73656@w3.org>
Cc: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>, Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com>, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>

Shane McCarron (1 sept. 2007 - 09:52) :
> Ben Adida wrote:
>> I'm loathe to start interpreting XHTML as RDFa in most cases, but  
>> I can
>> see the reason for <title>. That said, I don't see how we can make  
>> the
>> executive decision, in this task force, to map to dc:title. At best,
>> xh:title, as Mark mentions.
> In fact, XHTML2 says this explicitly at http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/ 
> 2007/ED-xhtml2-20070402/mod-document.html#edef_document_title

Thanks Shane, So I gather it is.

<> xh:title "The Old Man And The Sea - Literature" .

Did you think about having a formal RDF schema for XHTML 2.0 as large?
Something which would be more oriented towards the semantics of the  

It could help to build Semantics Extractor. In fact I guess it could  
help mostly to have a meta model of HyperText, that all initiatives  
could use (Docbook, XHTML 2.0, HTML 5, RDFa, GRDDL, etc.)

Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
   QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
      *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Monday, 3 September 2007 01:54:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:01:52 UTC