- From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 13:00:20 +0100
- To: "Niklas Lindström" <lindstream@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Ben Adida" <ben@adida.net>, "Shane McCarron" <shane@aptest.com>, "public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf. w3. org" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Hi Niklas, > Just to be clear; was it agreed that the base element in head will be > intrepreted to the same affect in XHTML 1.1? So that: > > <base href="http://example.org" /> > </head> > <body> > <div about="#me"> > <span property="foaf:givenname">Niklas</span> > <a rel="foaf:homepage" href="/niklas"> > </div> > > yields: > > <http://example.org#me> > foaf:givenname "Niklas"; > foaf:homepage <http://example.org/niklas> . > > ? I believe so.. (Which implies that base will be peeked at RDFa > process startup.) Yes, that's in the syntax document. It also explicitly says that even if <base> comes after <link> and <meta> in the <head>, it must be honoured. This was added so as to draw attention to this for anyone who was using a SAX-style approach to the parsing. Regards, Mark -- Mark Birbeck, formsPlayer mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232 http://www.formsPlayer.com | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com standards. innovation.
Received on Friday, 14 September 2007 12:00:32 UTC