Re: RDFa Syntax document technical issues

Hi Niklas,

> Just to be clear; was it agreed that the base element in head will be
> intrepreted to the same affect in XHTML 1.1? So that:
>
>         <base href="http://example.org" />
>     </head>
>     <body>
>         <div about="#me">
>             <span property="foaf:givenname">Niklas</span>
>             <a rel="foaf:homepage" href="/niklas">
>         </div>
>
> yields:
>
>     <http://example.org#me>
>         foaf:givenname "Niklas";
>         foaf:homepage <http://example.org/niklas> .
>
> ? I believe so.. (Which implies that base will be peeked at RDFa
> process startup.)

Yes, that's in the syntax document. It also explicitly says that even
if <base> comes after <link> and <meta> in the <head>, it must be
honoured. This was added so as to draw attention to this for anyone
who was using a SAX-style approach to the parsing.

Regards,

Mark

-- 
  Mark Birbeck, formsPlayer

  mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232
  http://www.formsPlayer.com | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com

  standards. innovation.

Received on Friday, 14 September 2007 12:00:32 UTC