- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 11:15:19 -0500
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- CC: W3C RDFa task force <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, Ralph Swick <swick@w3.org>
Ivan Herman wrote: > Hm. My prediction is that the RDFa syntax document will become a REC > _before_ the CURIE document will become a REC. In which case you cannot > update the syntax document any more (unless issuing a new release...) > > I know, I am very 'selfish' here, and my primary goal is to have the > current RDFa work done. Anything that smells a delay makes me feel itchy:-) > Relax. There is no dependency. And if we need to make an editorial update there is a W3C process for it even post REC. We do this stuff all the time. On the other hand, I concur that the aspects of CURIEs that are included in the syntax document must be minimal. Mark and I are working that right now. Thanks for your comments. -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Tuesday, 11 September 2007 16:15:35 UTC