- From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 16:29:55 +0100
- To: "Dan Brickley" <danbri@danbri.org>
- Cc: "Shane McCarron" <shane@aptest.com>, "Hausenblas, Michael" <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>, "Dave Beckett" <dave@dajobe.org>, "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org>, "W3C RDFa task force" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Hi Dan, We're working hard to make a completed draft of the syntax document for XHTML+RDFa available in early October. This will contain resolutions to all of the issues we've been discussing this past period, and will then hopefully become a Working Draft. There will also be an update to the Primer, but we've decided to keep that as a note rather than send it through rec track. Hopefully that answers your question...and sorry that we hadn't made that clear before. It is actually in various minutes, somewhere, but I realise that some people have a life.... :) Regards, Mark On 04/09/07, Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org> wrote: > > Shane McCarron wrote: > > > > Without addressing any of your issues, per se, the current Editor's > > Draft of the RDFa Syntax document (and the xhtml-rdfa module) is always > > available via the XHTML Working Group drafts page at > > http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Drafts - that page is updated as new drafts are > > developed. > > Is there a plan for a real Working Draft? This stuff is coming on > nicely, but deserves a proper review from the wider world. And W3C has > mechanisms in place for that, focussed around /TR/ ... > > IMHO a /TR/ publication will increase changes of commercial uptake in > the near future. The validator.w3.org support also counts for a lot. > > cheers, > > Dan > > > -- Mark Birbeck, formsPlayer mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232 http://www.formsPlayer.com | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com standards. innovation.
Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2007 15:30:09 UTC